| Committee
Correspondence The Committee on Energy and Commerce W.J. "Billy" Tauzin, Chairman Tauzin Requests FCC Response On Access Charge Rules Questions January 29, 2004 Michael K. Powell More than fifteen months ago, AT&T filed a petition (WC Docket No.
02-361) asking the Federal Communications Commission (the Commission) to
determine whether access charges apply to long-distance voice calls that
AT&T transports over its Internet Protocol (IP) backbone. The petition did
not ask the Commission to change its current rules -- it simply asked the
Commission to state what its existing access charge rules require today. Yet,
fifteen months later, the Commission has failed to answer this straightforward
question. In the meantime, the Commission's silence on the question has been
deafening. I am extremely concerned that the Commission's continued failure to
clarify the rules governing traffic over AT&T's IP backbone could jeopardize
our ability to keep telephone rates in rural areas affordable. Accordingly, I request that by February 5, 2004 you provide me with a direct
answer to the following question: Do the Commission's existing access charge
rules apply to the long-distance service described in AT&T's petition? I am
not asking whether those rules apply to the services described in other
petitions, such as those filed by Pulver.com, Vonage, Level 3, or any other
provider. I am also not asking whether the Commission may change its access
charge rules in the future. I would simply like to know whether the traffic
described in AT&T's petition is subject to access charges today under the
Commission's existing rules. Silence is not acceptable. Sincerely, W.J. "Billy" Tauzin Cc: Commissioner Kathleen Abernathy Related Documents The
Committee on Energy and Commerce |