|
The House Committee on Energy and Commerce
Full Committee on Energy and Commerce
June 10, 2003
10:00 AM
2123 Rayburn House Office Building
Mr. Chairman and Members of the Committee:
I appreciate the opportunity to appear before you today to discuss EIA's
outlook for the U.S. natural gas market. The source of our short term
projections is the June 2003 release of EIA's monthly Short-Term Energy Outlook;
the long term projections are drawn from the National Energy Modeling System (NEMS).
The EIA is the statutorily chartered statistical and analytical agency within
the Department of Energy. We are charged with providing objective, timely, and
relevant data, analysis, and projections for the use of the Department of
Energy, other Government agencies, the U.S. Congress, and the public. We do not
take positions on policy issues. We produce data and analysis reports that are
meant to help policy makers determine energy policy. Because we have an element
of statutory independence with respect to the analyses that we publish, our
views are strictly those of EIA. They should not be construed as representing
those of the Department of Energy or the Administration.
Summary
Short-Term Natural Gas Market (Through 2004)
Currently, the natural gas market in the United States is tight, with gas
storage levels lagging well behind normal levels. Spot natural gas prices
reflect this deficit and the expectation that demand, while not necessarily
expected to exceed levels seen in 2002 on an annual basis, remains at a high
level relative to domestic natural gas supply capability. The high market prices
and strong drilling efforts are expected to ultimately allow gas storage volumes
to move closer to normal by the beginning of the next heating season. This
expectation, however, is predicated on prices continuing at high levels
($5.50-$6.00 per million Btu) through the next winter.
Longer-Term Natural Gas Market (Through 2025)
By 2025 total natural gas consumption is expected to increase to almost 35
trillion cubic feet (Tcf) or 26 percent of U.S. delivered energy consumption.
Such a demand level represents an increase of about 52 percent from the expected
2003 level. Domestic gas production is expected to increase more slowly than
consumption over the forecast, rising from 19.5 Tcf in 2001 to 26.4 Tcf in 2025.
Growing production reflects increasing natural gas demand and is supported by
rising wellhead gas prices, relatively abundant gas resources, and improvements
in technologies, particularly for unconventional gas.
Short-Term Gas Market Analysis
Overview of U.S. Natural Gas Markets
The natural gas market is tight. The natural gas spot price at the Henry Hub
(the market location used for pricing the New York Mercantile Exchange gas
futures contracts) is high in historical terms for this time of the year. Spot
natural gas prices have fluctuated around $6 per million btu (mmbtu) over the
last several weeks, and levels of natural gas in underground storage remain low
two months into the injection season. At the end of May, working gas in storage
stood about 38 percent below end-of-May 2002 levels and 28 percent below the
previous 5-year average. Spot natural gas prices will likely average $5-$6 per
mmbtu through the rest of this year. The exceptionally low level of natural gas
storage continues to place unusually strong upward pressure on near-term natural
gas prices. In the current environment companies will need to obtain large
amounts of natural gas from other sources to refill storage for the next heating
season. Moreover, if abnormally warm weather prevails this summer the current
market may become highly sensitive to demand, particularly in the Western and
South Central United States, where natural gas is heavily used for power
generation. Such conditions could cause a mid-year run-up in prices well above
current levels (about $6 per mmbtu). However such price run-ups are usually
short lived.
The projections outlined above are made at the national level, but it is
important to emphasize that regional prices can diverge. Regional prices can
also be highly volatile. For example, the average April spot price for natural
gas traded at New York City was $5.94, down considerably from the $8.81 seen in
March, a result of the usual change in seasonal demand levels but also of the
high margins between the New York city gate and the Henry Hub that sometimes
arise during peak demand periods.

Natural Spot Price (Base Case and 95% Confidence Range*)
*The confidence intervals show +/- 2 standard errors based on the properties
of the model. The ranges do not include the effects of major supply
disruptions.Sources: History: Natural Gas Week; Projections: Short-Term Energy
Outlook, June 2003.
Natural Gas Supply and Demand
With high natural gas prices, natural gas demand is expected to remain flat in
2003. Flat demand this year is likely despite sharply higher weather-related
demand during the first quarter of 2003. Natural gas demand in 2004 is expected
to remain flat as high prices discourage use enough to offset increases that
might otherwise have accompanied industrial growth. Gas-intensive industrial growth (i.e., a composite index of industrial output,
weighted by industry use of natural gas) is likely to be well below 1 percent
this year, if indeed it is positive.
Natural Gas Demand Trends
Sources: History: EIA; Projections: Short-Term Energy Outlook, June 2003.
Demand for natural gas this summer is expected to fall by about 1 percent from
last summer's level. This is in part due to weaker industrial demand. Under our
assumption of normal weather, cooling degree-days for the season (Q2 2003 and Q3
2003) would be close to 10 percent below year-ago levels, reducing gas usage for
power generation. In the event of a hotter-than-
normal summer this year, natural gas prices could move higher as
cooling-related demand would compete with the need to build storage inventories.
The National Climate Prediction Center currently indicates that above-average
temperatures in the U.S. Southwest and parts of Texas are likely in June and
possibly in the third quarter as well. Such a development could increase gas
demand for power generation and increase pressure on spot prices.
U.S. Working Gas in Underground Storage

NOTE: Colored Band is Minimum & Maximum Values 1998-2002
Sources: History: EIA. Projections: Short-Term Energy Outlook, June 2003.
Working natural gas in storage is estimated to have reached about 1,212
billion cubic feet (bcf) at the end of May, 38 percent below the year-ago level.
This is the second lowest aggregate inventory level for the end of May recorded
by EIA. Eastern and producing regions stocks, in particular, are at very low
levels. Demand for natural gas to refill working gas storage in 2003 will be
higher than average, which means that prices are likely to remain volatile.
Storage is expected to build to about 2,900 billion cubic feet by the end of
October. Under normal weather conditions, this should be enough to allow storage
to be about 1 trillion cubic feet at the end of next winter, near to normal for
that stage of the storage cycle.
Domestic Natural Gas Drilling Activity
Sources: History: Baker-Hughes and EIA. Projections: Short-Term Energy
Outlook, June 2003.
Natural gas production declined in 2002. Part of the loss was due to the
effects of hurricane activity in the Gulf of Mexico in September and October.
The last significant disruption in gas supply prior to the fall of 2002 was
September of 1998. (While hurricanes regularly threaten platforms in the Gulf of
Mexico, actual production impacts that are considered significant are not really
very frequent and, when they do occur they tend to be short-lived.) Production
is expected to increase by 2.2 percent this year. High natural gas prices and
sharply higher oil and natural gas field revenues are expected to drive a
resurgence in natural gas-directed drilling activity this year following a
downturn in 2002. Monthly oil and natural gas field revenues are expected to
continue to average close to
$400 million this year. Domestic production growth should continue in 2004
but, given recent experience, the extra effort might result in increases of less
than 2 percent from 2003 levels. The prospects for significant reductions in
natural gas wellhead prices over the forecast period from the current high
levels hinges in large measure on the productivity of the expected upsurge in
drilling in terms of expected output.
U.S. Oil and Gas Field Revenues
Lower 48 Gas Well Productive Capacity Share By Well Age
Source:EIA
Net Imports
Prospects for sharp increases in net imports in 2003 are limited but we do
expect to see an overall increase in 2003 of about 2 percent. Substantial
increases in LNG imports are possible and we believe that they have made a
noticeable contribution already this year. Canadian exports to the United States
were up 3-4 percent from year ago in early 2003. Any growth in gross imports is
likely to be offset partially by increased exports to Mexico, which have been
rising sharply in recent years.
Prospects for Price Volatility
In light of the current low storage levels, chances of continued price
volatility are great. Let me raise some factors that could contribute to
volatility and analyze their likely impacts, as summarized in the Table below.
To examine these effects, we ran the model under alternative assumptions.
Volatility Factors
|
Factor
|
Assumption
|
Price
Impact
|
|
Weather
|
10%
Hotter Summer/Colder Winter Relative to Normal
|
50%-60%
higher peak price this winter
|
|
Lower
than expected domestic supply
|
Productive
capacity continues to weaken, no production growth in 2003
|
10%-20%
higher peak price this winter
|
The table shows that a significant tightening of the U.S. natural gas market
and much higher prices than expected in our base case are possible under some
plausible scenarios. One development that could generate more difficult market
conditions than are already in prospect is the weather. An abnormally hot summer
followed by a cold winter could push natural gas deliverability to the limit and
cause record average prices this winter. The severe weather case considered here
is an extreme case but one that merits attention given the lack of storage
cushion. It is also apparent that less robust assumptions about natural gas
productive capacity and near-term production could shift average prices well
above our base case. It appears that for every 1 percent that production falls
below our base case assumptions, we can expect 5-10 percent higher peak prices
this winter. These estimated average impacts mask the potential for much more
dramatic spikes in prices for short periods (a few days to a few weeks). Such
spikes are characteristic of net demand surges in the context of low natural gas
storage. Thus, current and prospective conditions in the U.S. gas market
significantly increase the probability of very sharp short-term spikes on top of
generally high levels of natural gas prices.
There are no detailed estimates concerning the extent to which industrial output
weakness seen since 2000 is attributable to the recent episodes of natural gas
price strength. It is obvious, however, that many industries dependent upon
natural gas for basic processes and operations have been hurt by high natural
gas prices. Part of the short-term market response to the current imbalance in
supplies may be to let high prices back out industrial activity to insure that
higher-valued demands, such as heating, are met. While the price volatility
described in this section is clearly possible, it is not a foregone conclusion.
Normal weather, improved productivity from newer natural gas wells and other
factors could serve to moderate price increases. It is also important to note
that recent history illustrates that price volatility is usually short-lived.
Spot Natural Gas Price Scenarios
Sources: History: EIA; Projections: Short-Term Energy Outlook, June 2003
Longer-Term Natural Gas Market Analysis
The longer-term natural gas projections provided in this testimony were produced
using the National Energy Modeling System (NEMS), a computer-based,
energy-economy modeling system of U.S. energy markets through 2025. NEMS
projects annual production, imports, consumption, and prices of energy, subject
to assumptions on macroeconomic and financial factors, world energy markets,
resource availability and costs, behavioral and technological choice criteria,
cost and performance characteristics of energy technologies, and demographics.
Two of the key inputs to NEMS are re world oil prices and macroeconomic growth.
World oil prices averaged about $23.43 per barrel in 2002 in 2001 dollars.
Between now and 2025 they are expected to rise to about $26.60 a barrel in 2001
dollars, as world oil demand increases from 78 million barrels per day to 119
million barrels per day. Real gross domestic product (GDP) is projected to grow
at an annual average rate of 3.0 percent between 2001 and 2025.
The natural gas projections discussed in this testimony are based on the most
current NEMS configuration, which EIA recently used in analyzing a 10 percent
renewable portfolio standard, as requested by Senator Bingaman.
Natural Gas Outlook to 2025
By 2025 total natural gas consumption is expected to increase to almost 35
trillion cubic feet (Tcf) or 26 percent of U.S. delivered energy consumption.

Domestic gas production is expected to increase more slowly than consumption
over the forecast, rising from 19.5 Tcf in 2001 to 26.4 Tcf in 2025. Growing
production reflects increasing natural gas demand and is supported by rising
wellhead gas prices, relatively abundant gas resources, and improvements in
technologies, particularly for unconventional gas. In this forecast, economic
conditions allow an Alaskan pipeline to begin moving gas to the lower 48 States
in 2020. The national average wellhead price is projected to reach $3.95 per Mcf
in 2001 dollars by 2025.
The difference between consumption and production is made up by increasing
use of imports throughout the forecast, particularly from liquefied natural gas
(LNG), with a 2.1 Tcf increase expected over 2001 levels. By 2025 we expect
expansion at the four existing terminals and construction of three new LNG
terminals.
Consumption. U.S. natural gas consumption is expected to increase by 1.8
percent annually from 2001 through 2025. Gas consumption by electric generators
is expected to double over the forecast, from 5.3 Tcf in 2001 to 10.4 Tcf in
2025, an average annual growth rate of 2.8 percent. Demand by electricity
generators is expected to account for 30 percent of total natural gas
consumption in 2025.
Most new electricity generation capacity is expected to be fueled by natural
gas, so natural gas consumption in the electricity generation sector is
projected to grow rapidly throughout the forecast as electricity consumption
increases. Although average coal prices to electricity generators are projected
to fall throughout the forecast, gas-fired generators are expected to have
advantages over coal-fired generators, including lower capital costs, higher
fuel efficiencies, shorter construction lead times, and lower emissions.

Historically the industrial sector, excluding lease and plant fuel, is the
largest gas-consuming sector, with significant amounts of gas used in the bulk
chemical and refining sectors. Industrial consumption is expected to increase by
3.4 Tcf over the forecast, driven primarily by macroeconomic growth. The
chemical and metal durables sectors show the largest growth.
Combined consumption in the residential and commercial sectors is projected
to increase by 2.5 Tcf from 2001 to 2025, driven by increasing population,
healthy economic growth, and gradually rising prices in real terms. Natural gas
remains the overwhelming choice for home heating throughout the forecast period,
with the number of natural gas furnaces rising nearly 18 million.
Production. The forecast estimate of total technically recoverable natural
gas resources as of January 1, 2002, is 1,289 Tcf. These resource assessments
come primarily from the assessments done by the U.S. Geological Survey for
onshore regions and by the Mineral Management Service for the offshore.
These resources included 183 Tcf of proved reserves (9 years of consumption
at 20 Tcf per year), 222 Tcf of inferred reserves, and 269 Tcf of undiscovered
nonassociated conventional resources. The largest category was unconventional
resources at 445 Tcf, with most of that in tight sandstones at 71 percent. Other
unconventional natural gas resources include gas shales and coalbed methane.
Alaska gas (32 Tcf) and associated-dissolved natural gas in lower 48 crude oil
reservoirs (137 Tcf) round out the resource.
Increased U.S. natural gas production through 2025 comes primarily from
unconventional sources and from Alaska. Unconventional gas production increases
by 4.2 Tcf over the forecast period-more than any other source, largely because
of expanded tight sands gas production in the Rocky Mountain region. Annual
production from unconventional sources is expected to account for 36 percent of
production in 2025, more than any other source, compared to 28 percent today.

Conventional onshore non-associated production increases by 500 Bcf over the
forecast, driven by technological improvements and rising natural gas prices.
However, its share of total production declines from 34 percent in 2001 to 27
percent by 2025. Non-associated offshore production adds 710 Bcf, with increased
drilling activity in deep waters; however, its share of total U.S. production
declines from 22 percent in 2001 to 19 percent by 2025.
Depletion. A key question facing producers and policymakers today is whether
natural gas resources in the mature onshore lower 48 States have been exploited
to a point at which more rapid depletion rates eliminate the possibility of
increasing-or even maintaining-current production levels at reasonable cost.
Depletion is a natural phenomenon that accompanies the development of all
nonrenewable resources. Physically, depletion is the progressive reduction of
the overall volume of a resource over time as the resource is produced. In the
petroleum industry, depletion may also more narrowly refer to the decline of
production associated with a particular well, reservoir, or field. As existing
wells, reservoirs, and fields are depleted, new resources must be developed to
replace depleted reservoirs.
Depletion has been counterbalanced historically by improvements in technology
that have allowed gas resources to be discovered more efficiently, have extended
the economic life of existing fields, and have allowed natural gas to be
produced less expensively, making available resources that previously were too
costly to develop. In these natural gas projections, technological progress for
both conventional and unconventional recovery is expected to continue to enhance
exploration, reduce costs, and improve production technology.
The depletion of conventional and unconventional natural gas resources is
expected to continue over the projection period as the demand for natural gas
increases significantly, continuing the trend that began in the mid-1990s.
Nevertheless, with sustained wellhead prices generally over $3 per thousand
cubic feet (in 2001 dollars) and continued technological improvements, lower 48
nonassociated gas production is expected to increase above current levels.
Imports. Net imports of natural gas, primarily from Canada, are projected to
increase from 3.7 trillion cubic feet in 2001 to 7.9 trillion cubic feet in
2025. Imports contributed 16 percent to total natural gas supply in 2001,
compared to an expected 23 percent in 2025.

Just over half of the increase in U.S. imports is expected to come from LNG.
Much of the increase comes from expansion at existing sites, but three
additional facilities are also projected. By 2025, LNG imports are expected to
equal 7 percent of total U.S. gas supply.
Growth in pipeline imports from Canada partly depends on the completion of
the MacKenzie Delta pipeline. The initial full flow rate into Alberta is assumed
to be 1.5 Bcf per day. Additional Canadian imports will come from the Scotian
Shelf in the offshore Atlantic. The forecast of Canadian imports largely depends
on the ability of Canadian producers to economically produce and market their
untapped unconventional resources, particularly coalbed methane. Net imports
from Canada are projected to provide 15 percent of total U.S. supply in 2025 in
the reference case, about the same as in 2001.
Wellhead Prices. In the mid-term, gas prices are projected to move higher as
technology improvements and new supply sources prove unable to completely offset
the effects of resource depletion and increased demand.
Natural gas prices through 2025 are projected to increase in an uneven
fashion as major new, large-volume supply projects temporarily depress prices
when initially brought online. Examples include deep and ultra-deep offshore
projects in the Gulf of Mexico, unconventional gas (tight sands, coalbed
methane, shale), liquefied natural gas facilities (both the expansion of
existing and development of new facilities), the MacKenzie Delta pipeline in
Canada, and an Alaskan natural gas pipeline that delivers gas supplies to the
lower 48 States.
In the reference case, average wellhead natural gas prices are expected to be
$3.95 per thousand cubic feet (2001 dollars) in 2025. The increase reflects
rising demand for natural gas and the impact of the progression of discoveries
from larger and more profitable fields to smaller, less economical ones. In
current dollars, natural gas prices reach $7.15 in 2025.
End-Use Prices. End-use natural gas prices are expected to increase gradually
starting in about 2005 as a result of increasing wellhead prices. A portion of
the increase in wellhead prices is expected to be offset by a projected decline
in average transmission and distribution margins as a larger proportion of the
natural gas delivery infrastructure becomes fully depreciated. The average
end-use price is expected to increase by 40 cents per thousand cubic feet
between 2005 and 2025 (in constant 2001 dollars), compared with an increase of
72 cents per thousand cubic feet in the average price of domestic and imported
natural gas supplies over the same period. Part of this difference is
attributable to an increasing share of natural gas sold to electric generators,
the sector with the lowest prices.
Printer
Friendly |