Who We Are Republican Views Newsroom Documents Archives Subcommittees Search the site Home

Prepared Witness Testimony

The House Committee on Energy and Commerce

 

SARS: Assessment, Outlook, and Lessons Learned

Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations
May 7, 2003
2:00 PM
2123 Rayburn House Office Building 

 

Dr. Nils Lonberg Ph.D.
Senior Vice President, Scientific Director
Medarex, Inc.
521 Cottonwood Drive
Milpitas, CA, 95035

I will try to give you a very brief snapshot of how a particular class of biotechnology products (monoclonal antibodies) could play a role in preventing SARS infections.  And, in particular, how one US biotechnology company in partnership with a non-profit publicly owned research and manufacturing group are working together in this effort.  I will try to leave you with Three take-home messages: 

1.   Monoclonal antibody technology is one of the tools of modern biotechnology that can be employed to combat the SARS virus. 

2.   Finding new medicines is never a quick fix; however, we will be working as rapidly as possible. 

3.   The government can play a role in facilitating the efforts of biotechnology companies in the emerging disease area.
  • Medarex is collaborating with the Massachusetts Biologic Laboratories (MBL) to develop a monoclonal antibody to prevent Coronavirus associated SARS. 

  • Medarex is a publicly listed US biotechnology company with facilities in NJ and CA. 

  • MBL, University of Massachusetts Medical School is the only non-profit FDA-licensed manufacturer of vaccines and other biologic products in the United States. MBL has seven FDA licensed vaccines and/or polyclonal antibody products. In addition MBL has manufactured 4 monoclonal antibodies for clinical trials in collaboration with NIH and/or private collaborations.

  • Antibodies are a critical component of the body's immune defense against viruses and other infectious agents. 

  • Vaccines stimulate the body to produce antibodies that will recognize a particular virus. 

  • In the absence of an effective vaccine, monoclonal antibodies (i.e., genetically engineered antibodies) can potentially provide protection from infection.  

  • Antibody based therapies have been employed since their first discovery over a hundred years ago by Kitasano and Behring. 

  • The first such therapies used serum from immunized large animals such as horses and sheep. 

Human and animal serum products are still used today; however, we now have new tools that allow for the development of genetically engineered-monoclonal-antibody based therapeutic drugs.
  • There are now 12 monoclonal antibody based therapeutic products that are approved by the FDA. 

  • The 12 monoclonal antibody based therapeutic products are used in a variety of indications, including cancer, heart disease, arthritis, and infectious diseases. 

One of these monoclonal antibodies, Synagis® (MedImmune, Gaithersburg MD), is directed against a virus called Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV).

Synagis® was developed as a safe (non-blood product derived) and consistent (molecularly characterized) alternative to a human serum derived therapy, RespiGam®.

 

The success of Synagis® suggests that a similar monoclonal antibody-based therapeutic may be useful for preventing SARS infections.

Medarex is focused primarily on the development of monoclonal antibodies derived from its own proprietary technology for the generation of human monoclonal antibodies.

This technology uses genetically engineered strains of mice that carry human immune system genes within their genomes

There are now 10 different human antibody based drugs in human clinical testing based on Medarex's technology.  Some are being developed by Medarex and others by major pharmaceutical companies like Novartis and Johnson & Johnson.

To develop a SARS drug, Medarex and MBL plan to: 

1.    Immunize transgenic mice with SARS virus antigens

2.   Generate a panel of potential therapeutic candidates

3.   Test these candidates for their ability to neutralize the SARS virus

4.   Select a lead candidate

5.   Develop a recombinant manufacturing cell line that produces large quantities of the lead candidate.

6.   Test this material for safety in animals and humans

7.   Test for efficacy in humans. 

  • The first 5 steps may be completed in as little as two years.  The development of laboratory and animal model assays for step 3 will be critical.

  • Human efficacy testing will probably be the most time consuming step

  • How do biotech companies make pipeline decisions? 

  • Resources are scarce and must be allocated based on calculated value of future products 

  • The value of future products is derived from estimates of chance of success, time to development, cost of goods, price of drug, size of market, and competition 

  • For emerging disease indications it is very difficult to calculate a risk adjusted value for a future product (for SARS we do not yet know enough to calculate any of the above with a reasonable degree of certainty). 

  • The government can play a role to encourage biotech and pharmaceutical companies in this area by removing some uncertainties (such as establishing a defined market) or by underwriting some of the research and development costs.

 

Printer Friendly

Tipline: Report Waste, Fraude, and Abuse
Majority Site