Mr. Chairman, thank you for holding this
important hearing today. The subject of violence in the media is one that many
parents often raise with Members when we are home in our districts. They are
rightly concerned about the effects that prolific violence in the media may have
on their children, and generally are eager to limit their kids' exposure to it
as much as possible.
But parents need help in the 21st century to
understand what exactly is contained in the movies their kids watch, the music
they listen to, and the video games they play. Gone are the days when there was
one family phonograph player in the living room. Today kids listen to music over
personal headsets that do not allow parents to monitor what is going directly
into their children's ears and heads.
I commend the efforts taken by the motion picture
industry and the video games industry to give parents additional information and
guidelines to better understand what is contained within a particular video game
or movie. I particularly appreciate the efforts of the video game industry that
six years ago took the initiative to institute an Entertainment Software Rating
Board for its relatively new industry that many parents knew little about. This
board provides a rating to each video game based on age appropriateness as well
clear information about the content that influenced that rating, such as
violence, strong language or suggestive themes. I encourage the video game
industry to continue to educate consumers about these ratings to retailers and
consumers who may not yet be familiar with the relatively new system.
The motion picture industry has made great
efforts to supplement their traditional system.the one most folks have relied
upon for decades.with descriptions about why R rated movies may be
inappropriate for children under 17 not accompanied by a parent. Similarly, the
video game industry has developed its own new age based system that also
describes why a particular game may earn a M: for mature rating.
As for the recording industry - I call upon you
to get "in sync" with your industry counterparts to help educate
consumers about the material that your members themselves deem to be
"explicit." I hope that you will recognize opportunities to improve
your industry efforts to help parents better understand your products. I would
like you to seriously readdress whether or not the current one size fits all
labeling system for music could be expanded to provide additional information
about the content consumers can expect to hear. When 15 of Billboard's current
top 50 albums -- that's 30 percent of the most popular albums today -- receive
parental advisory warnings, I believe the industry has a responsibility to let
consumers know why.
I do agree with the RIAA that the informational
systems regarding content should be tailored to the specific medium that they
rate. Unlike an explicit video scene in a movie or video game, a single song can
mean many different things to many different people. However, as technological
advances allow artists to include simulated real life sounds, such as mutilating
another human being, into their work, there is less room for individual
interpretation of a musical piece. Yes - Lyrics alone are indeed susceptible to
varying interpretations, however, the sound of slicing a human being's throat
while shouting the word "bleed," arguably leaves less to the
imagination.
This Committee is well aware of the First
Amendment implications of government regulation of artistic material. But there
is legislation currently before the Energy and Commerce Committee that would
enable the government to enforce policies against marketing and selling this
material to minors, and we need to think about it very carefully. I hope that we
can use this opportunity today to learn more about what industry is doing on
their own to address this problem to avoid the need for Congress to step in and
take action.
Finally, I want to apologize to all the Members
of the Committee for the inconvenience regarding late testimony. The last time I
reviewed the Committee instructions that are sent out to witnesses, they seemed
to clearly lay out the directions for when and how to submit testimony. These
rules exist in order to allow staff and Members time to review testimony in
advance and have the most productive hearing possible. I hope that in the future
all witnesses will respect this Committee process.
Once again, thank you, Mr. Chairman, for holding
this important hearing, and I look forward to asking our witnesses some
questions.