|
Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations
July 19, 2002
09:30 AM
2123 Rayburn House Office Building
Mr.
Chairman and members of the subcommittee, I appreciate this opportunity to
appear before you to discuss the Department of Energy's Environmental Management
(EM) Program reforms and their impact on Tennessee compliance agreements.
Beginning
in the late 1970's and continuing through the early 1980's, the state of
Tennessee sought to exercise its rights to enforce state environmental standards
at the self-regulated federal facilities on the Department of Energy's (DOE)
Oak Ridge Reservation (ORR). The state initially met with stiff resistance from
the federal authorities. But gradually, beginning in the mid-1980s', real
progress has been made in environmental compliance.
DOE's 35,000 acre Oak
Ridge Reservation is located in water-rich eastern Tennessee, along the Clinch
River and within the boundary of the city of Oak Ridge. The reservation played a
major role in the production of materials for the Manhattan Project during World
War II. Since the end of the Cold War, the focus has shifted to cleaning up the
legacy of nuclear weapons production.
Today, more than 45,000
Tennesseans live within five miles of a DOE facility. DOE is responsible for
environmental management, research and development, uranium enrichment, defense
programs and other activities on the Oak Ridge Reservation. Tennessee expects
the missions of the National Nuclear Security Administration's Y-12 Area
Office and the Oak Ridge National Laboratory to continue and improve.
DOE
is subject to most federal environmental laws. The Clean Air Act, the Clean
Water Act, the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), the Comprehensive
Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA) and other
environmental laws all apply to DOE.
DOE
is self-regulating under the Atomic Energy Act, which applies to many types of
radioactive materials. However, under the Tennessee Oversight Agreement, the
state of Tennessee is involved in non-regulatory oversight of DOE's
radiological issues.
The
Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation (TDEC) ensures that DOE
complies with CERCLA through the Federal Facilities Agreement for the Oak Ridge
Reservation, which was signed by DOE, EPA and the state in 1992. The agreement
establishes environmental cleanup and restoration procedures and milestones for
the Oak Ridge Reservation. The TDEC DOE Oversight office plays the primary role
in enforcing the obligations created under this agreement.
The
oversight office coordinates with other TDEC divisions to ensure that DOE does
not cause excessive pollution to the air, water and land. For example, TDEC is
federally authorized to carry out its own regulatory program for RCRA. This
federal authorization is granted only after EPA determines that state law is at
least as stringent as federal law and regulations in the same area.
Tennessee's RCRA program consists of many statutes, rules and permits as well
as a series of requirements contained in numerous enforcement orders issued to
DOE.
TDEC
issued a commissioner's order to DOE in 1992 to assure the proper storage,
treatment and disposal of hazardous pond waste. A TDEC consent order issued in
1993 modified storage and treatment permits regarding out-of-state waste from
DOE-owned facilities. Another commissioner's order, issued in 1995, addresses
mixed waste treatment and storage at all DOE facilities in Oak Ridge and
established the Site Treatment Plan required by the Federal Facilities
Compliance Act of 1992. A commissioner's
order issued in 1999 led to a consent order with DOE that established a plan for
DOE to pay a perpetual care fee to ensure resources are available to conduct
necessary, long-term surveillance and maintenance activities at a CERCLA waste
disposal facility. A 1999 consent order contains a plan that relates to the storage and
disposition of uranium hexafluoride (UF6) cylinders located on the reservation.
In addition, relevant state statutes and regulations are applied to DOE waste
management and cleanup activities and several permits have been issued to DOE,
including incineration of waste, treatment of wastewater and storage of
hazardous wastes.
Tennessee's
primary concern is the protection of public health, safety and the environment.
Tennessee, DOE, and EPA are working with stakeholders to address a number of
problems related to these issues. There is groundwater contamination on and off
of the Oak Ridge Reservation. As a result, DOE is restricting its use. There are
over 100 miles of contaminated rivers and streams that are being addressed
through fish consumption advisories and other institutional controls. Over 130
acres of buried waste containing 40 million pounds of uranium and 6 million
curies of buried radioactive waste, including deep well injection, remain on the
Oak Ridge Reservation. Over 250,000 curies of radioactive waste have been
discharged into surface streams from the Oak Ridge Reservation. Over 339,000
pounds of mercury were released from the Y-12 Plant into the East Fork Poplar
Creek and the Clinch and Tennessee Rivers. There are six shutdown nuclear
research reactors and over 400 other surplus deteriorating facilities that will
have to be decontaminated and decommissioned or demolished. DOE also stores the
largest inventory of its low level radioactive waste, mixed low level
radioactive waste and remote handled transuranic waste on the Oak Ridge
Reservation (44 percent of the low level radioactive waste, 56 percent of the
mixed low level waste and 76 percent of the remote handled transuranic waste).
For
the past year and a half, the state of Tennessee and EPA have been in informal
and formal dispute with DOE over the adequacy of DOE's commitment to the Oak
Ridge Reservation cleanup. The dispute specifically involved DOE's
unwillingness to commit to a reasonable level of work to remediate the Oak Ridge
Reservation in a timely manner. In February 2002, DOE released a
"Top-to-Bottom Review" of DOE's Environmental Management Program which
underscored the need to refocus DOE's cleanup effort on risk reduction and
mortgage reduction and to execute work more quickly. Each of these needs was
part of the state's dispute with DOE.
The
state signed a letter of intent with DOE and EPA to formalize
a commitment that would clean up high risk sites at the Oak Ridge Reservation by
2008, and substantially complete the balance of the work by 2016. Completion was
originally slated for 2021. The letter of intent also committed the state and
EPA to work with DOE to develop a plan to implement accelerated cleanup on the
Oak Ridge Reservation. The plan, signed on June 18, 2002, resolved the formal
dispute between Tennessee, EPA and DOE by meeting the state's and EPA's
requirement for more rapid cleanup at Oak Ridge.
DOE's
accelerated cleanup plan agreement
does not change any existing agreements with Tennessee, nor does it create any
new rights or remedies for either party. All previous orders issued to DOE and
all agreements entered into by DOE and TDEC remain in effect and shall continue
to be complied with by DOE. The agreement is simply intended to establish a
framework to promote cooperation between the parties and streamline the decision
making process. This will allow the parties to achieve the accelerated goals
documented in the Comprehensive Cleanup Proposal and Letter of Intent.
The
state of Tennessee uses a number of compliance agreements and commissioner's
orders to enforce environmental regulations at the Oak Ridge Reservation. These
are described separately below as is the success of the enforcement action on
the Oak Ridge Reservation cleanup.
LETTER OF
INTENT AMONG THE DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY, THE STATE OF TENNESSEE AND THE
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
The letter of intent signed in May 2002 commits
the state of Tennessee, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and the U.S.
Department of Energy to accelerate cleanup at the Oak Ridge Reservation. The
letter also documents how the results of DOE's top-to-bottom review and other
initiatives will be used to devise and implement a more efficient decision
making process, develop integrated planning and funding requests and meet
commitments under the Federal Facility Agreement for the Oak Ridge Reservation.
The letter outlines plans to clean up high-risk sites at the Oak Ridge
Reservation by 2008 and substantially complete the balance of the work by 2016.
Completion was originally slated for 2021.
OAK RIDGE
ACCELERATED CLEANUP PLAN AGREEMENT
The
agreement describes a streamlined decision making process to facilitate the
accelerated cleanup of the Oak Ridge Reservation and establishes future actions
needed to complete the cleanup. The agreement also resolved a formal Oak Ridge
Reservation Federal Facility Agreement milestone dispute by providing
enforceable milestones through fiscal year 2005. The agreement requires: a
performance management plan to provide a management-level synopsis of how the
proposed accelerated cleanup will be implemented; a comprehensive waste
disposition plan; and a comprehensive cleanup plan for the balance of the
program consisting of a baseline schedule that will include all of the DOE Oak
Ridge Environmental Management milestones and activities planned to complete the
accelerated cleanup plan through 2008 and the balance of the program projected
through 2016. The agreement also lists those outstanding issues that are
currently being addressed by the parties to the agreement.
FEDERAL
FACILITY AGREEMENT
The state of Tennessee, DOE,
and EPA signed the Federal Facility Agreement for the Oak Ridge Reservation (FFA)
in 1992. The agreement outlines a procedure for the reservation's cleanup,
including problem identification, activity scheduling and implementing and
monitoring appropriate responses. Actions taken under the FFA conform to CERCLA,
RCRA and other federal and state laws. Under the FFA, the three agencies agree
on a cleanup schedule, with clear deadlines for cleanup milestones. EPA and the
state have the authority to penalize DOE when these deadlines are missed.
The FFA for the Oak Ridge
Reservation has been successful. Examples of this success include:
-
Approximately
35 separate remedial actions are complete;
-
Several
site-wide remedial actions are ready to be implemented as funding becomes
available;
-
Over
50 decision documents have been approved over the last ten years; and
-
The
state of Tennessee plays a pivotal role in the development and oversight of
remedial actions.
The latest formal FFA
dispute was undertaken because DOE's proposed scope for enforceable milestones
for fiscal years 2002 through 2004 would not meet the expectations of the state
of Tennessee and EPA. The Oak Ridge Accelerated Cleanup Plan Agreement resolved
the dispute by integrating DOE Oak Ridge operations' planning and DOE
headquarters funding requests. This integration allowed DOE to commit to
substantial and enforceable milestones through fiscal
year 2005.
COMMISSIONER'S ORDER NO. 99-0438 - EMWMF
PERPETUAL CARE TRUST FUND
The
Environmental Management Waste Management Facility (EMWMF) record of decision
was signed in 1999. The commissioner's order was implemented to develop a
trust fund to ensure resources are available to conduct necessary surveillance
and maintenance activities at the facility to ensure long-term environmental
protection. The order requires DOE to provide $1 million per year for 14
consecutive years. DOE has been making these payments on schedule. The state of
Tennessee maintains the fund. The state expects this fund to provide necessary
resources for surveillance and maintenance beyond the closure date of the
facility.
COMMISSIONER'S ORDER 95-0514 - SITE TREATMENT
PLAN
The
Site Treatment Plan was implemented in October 1995 through a commissioner's
order, in compliance with the Federal Facility Act of 1992. This order
effectively established a plan and process through negotiation between the state
of Tennessee and DOE for establishing annual mixed waste treatment milestones to
eliminate the huge 138 million pound mixed waste inventory stored at Oak Ridge.
Annual implementation of this process from September 1995 through September 2001
has quite successfully reduced the massive inventory to 39 million pounds and
will continue until all legacy mixed waste has been treated.
At
issue now is DOE's commitment to Tennessee to commence shipments of mixed
remote-handled transuranic waste in storage at Oak Ridge to the Waste Isolation
Pilot Project (WIPP) facility beginning in January 2003. DOE has informed
Tennessee that based on a previously unrevealed interpretation of federal
regulation enacted in 1996 pertaining only to the WIPP facility itself that it
will not recognize Tennessee's ability to enforcement of any sort of shipment
schedule whether delayed by mutual agreement or not. Tennessee is willing to
recognize a delay for securing access to the WIPP facility for remote-handled
transuranic waste, and is prepared to fight to maintain its right to enforce a
schedule of shipment.
COMMISSIONER'S ORDER 99-0372 - PORTSMOUTH
CONTAMINATED SOILS
DOE's
failure in FY 1998 to treat the milestone quantity of mixed waste at the TSCA
incinerator resulted in another order with a civil penalty of $500,000. As has
become a tradition in Tennessee, an agreed order was jointly developed. The
order required DOE to complete a supplemental environmental project instead of
paying the cash penalty. Under this project, a legacy mixed waste stream of 3019
drums from Portsmouth, Ohio stored at Oak Ridge was removed from storage,
transported and disposed of at Envirocare of Utah.
COMMISSIONER'S ORDER 92-0412 - RCRA PERMITTED
STORAGE LIMITS
The
terms and conditions associated with three state of Tennessee issued RCRA
storage permits in 1992 caused an appeal by DOE, and resulted in a state issued
order. Ensuing discussions and negotiations resulted in an agreed order, which
partially achieved the goals of both parties. Specifically, DOE can store
off-site generated waste on-site up to 10 percent of the permitted capacity.
Additionally Tennessee may limit storage time to less than 30 days, unless
storage is incidental to treatment.
COMMISSIONER'S ORDER
97-0378/98-H0023 - MANAGEMENT AND DISPOSITION OF URANIUM HEXAFLUORIDE AT THE
EAST TENNESSEE TECHNOLOGY PARK (FORMER K-25)
This
commissioner's order, signed on February 2, 1999, states that "DOE shall
submit a plan containing schedules for activities that will ensure either
removal of all known DUF6 cylinders and their contents from ETTP or conversion
of the contents of such cylinders will be completed by December 31, 2009."
There is approximately 60,000 tons of DUF6 stored outdoors at ETTP, some since
the 1940s.
Closure
of ETTP is one of the three cornerstones of the accelerated closure plan
proposed by DOE. The accelerated closure plan cites 2008 as the target date for
closure. In order to close ETTP, all of the approximately 7,000 UF6 cylinders
must be removed. The accelerated closure plan will comply with the
commissioner's order. However, important prerequisites include conversion
capability to treat UF6, compensating states for emergency preparedness and
transportation safety expenses and providing or funding transportation security.
While
funding for the UF6 cylinder project has been included as a line item in the
accelerated closure plan, there are many uncertainties due to the enormity of
the project: adequate funding and adequate time for completion of the project
are concerns; a conversion contract must be awarded, over-pack containers must
be designed for transportation of the cylinders, and over-pack design must be
approved by the Department of Transportation and the Nuclear Regulatory
Commission; the involved states, including Tennessee, Ohio, and Kentucky, have
not been assured that emergency management and transportation issues have been
addressed; the states have not been assured that funding will be adequate for
inspections, needed response operations, and training of local and state
personnel in responding to potential accidents involving this radioactive
material; DOE has not made a proposal to the states regarding interstate
transportation and treatment of Tennessee's 60,000 tons of UF6; and the
conversion contract award has been postponed several times putting ETTP closure
planning at risk.
COMMISSIONER'S ORDER: CASE #91-3205 - POND
WASTE
This order was issued in
1992 because DOE violated the interim status standards for storage by storing
77,814 drums of listed hazardous waste, generated by the closure of K-1407-B and
C ponds at K-25. DOE agreed to implement and complete a waste management plan
consistent with the interim record of decision and the action plan. In lieu of
the civil penalty of $96,004, DOE agreed to remove and transport approximately
232 55 gallon drums of mixed waste, and 26 drums and 10 boxes of waste from the
Witherspoon Superfund site in Knoxville, TN to K-25 for storage, treatment
and/or disposal. The cost of this environmental clean-up project was estimated
to exceed $300,000.
COMMISSIONER'S ORDER 88-3434
- ATOMIC CITY AUTO PARTS SITE
DOE
is listed as a potential responsible party under state Superfund regulations
because a major portion of the contaminants of concern at the Atomic City Auto
Parts site came from material purchased from a DOE contractor. Soil
contamination at the site includes but is not limited to arsenic, barium,
cadmium, chromium, lead, mercury, selenium, silver, uranium, zinc, lithium and
polychlorinated biphenyls (PCB's). DOE has prepared and submitted to TDEC a
remedial investigation/feasibility study document. DOE has performed certain
removal actions in compliance with the order, but residual contamination
requires further action. TDEC has razed onsite buildings and completed two
interim removal actions. A third phase interim removal is currently ongoing.
Approximately 3,000 cubic yards of soil/debris are staged onsite awaiting final
disposition. Subsequent removal actions are proposed after completion of Phase
III and additional site characterization. DOE will reimburse TDEC for costs
associated with the remedial action up to $8 million.
COMMISSIONER'S ORDER
90-3443 - David Witherspoon, Inc.; 90-3442 Witherspoon Screen Arts Site;
903444 Witherspoon Landfill Site
DOE
is listed as a potential responsible party under state Superfund regulations
because a major portion of the contaminants of concern at the Witherspoon sites
came from material purchased from a DOE contractor. The parties to the Federal
Facility Agreement (Tennessee, EPA and DOE) agreed to allow DOE to use the
Environmental Restoration Benefit Assessment Matrix to set the priority of
cleanup of the Witherspoon Landfill site, Witherspoon Screen Arts site and David
Witherspoon, Inc, and to allow the sites to compete directly with FFA operable
units for DOE ORO funding.
The
David Witherspoon, Inc. site is located in a residential neighborhood in the
Vestal community of South Knoxville. DOE has completed a remedial
investigation/feasibility study of the property, confirming that onsite soils
are grossly contaminated with heavy metals, PCB's, dioxins/furans and
radioactivity. TDEC has reviewed the document and requested additional
characterization work, primarily with respect to defining the extent of
contamination.
Since
promulgation, DOE and/or TDEC have completed several interim measures at the
site, including placement of a fence and razor wire to restrict access, interim
removals of drummed mixed waste and contaminated scrap and drainage
diversion/control. A significant volume of scrap and debris that remains on the
surface must be managed prior to initiating cleanup of the contaminated soil.
The
Witherspoon Landfill site consists of approximately 50 acres, also located in
the Vestal community of South Knoxville. DOE has completed a remedial
investigation/feasibility study of the property. TDEC requested additional
characterization to define the lateral extent of contaminant migration. Interim
actions completed by DOE to date include various removals of contaminated scrap
and placement of an interim cap over a small area of contaminated soil to
prevent direct contact exposure.
TDEC
has completed an interim removal of approximately 1,000 cubic yards of
contaminated soil at the Witherspoon Screen Arts site. A remedial
investigation/feasibility study is needed to comply with the requirements of the
consent order.
COMMISSIONER'S ORDER Pending - ROSCOE FIELDS
PROPERTY
DOE
is listed as a potential responsible party under state Superfund regulations
because a major portion of the contaminants of concern at the Roscoe Fields'
property came from material purchased from a DOE contractor. Contaminants of
concern included 200 leaking drums containing Pyroquel threading oil), ethylene
glycol and radiological contamination. TDEC completed an emergency removal
action of the drums and incidentally contaminated soil. Waste materials were
transported to the DOE reservation for storage. A commissioner's order from
TDEC is pending to evaluate potential groundwater contamination resulting from
uncontrolled releases on the site. DOE is required to reimburse TDEC for all
cost associated with the removal action, including the current state overhead
cost rate.
That
concludes my testimony. I appreciate the opportunity to speak on behalf of the
state of Tennessee.
Printer
Friendly
Comment
On This Page
Related
Documents
|