Good morning, Mr.
Chairman, and members of the subcommittee. It is my pleasure to appear before
you today to discuss brownfields legislation. This is my first opportunity to
appear before the House Energy and Commerce Committee as Deputy Administrator of
EPA. I look forward to working with the members of the committee on this and
many other issues in the future. I commend Chairman Gillmor, Representative
Pallone, and all of the members of the subcommittee for developing brownfields
discussion drafts that seek to promote the cleanup and development of brownfield
properties and remove the barriers preventing the successful assessment, cleanup
and redevelopment of brownfields across this country. While the Administration
has a policy on not taking a position on a legislative discussion draft, I am
pleased to say that the Administration supports the direction of many of the
provisions that are being developed in Chairman Gillmor's discussion draft and
we look forward to the opportunity to support a bill as the committee completes
its work. As Governor Whitman has stated, enacting brownfields legislation this
year is an important priority for President Bush and this Administration and we
are committed to working with Congress to achieve that goal.
As we continue a
more thorough review of the draft, and the committee continues its deliberations
and introduces a bill, we would appreciate the opportunity to work with Chairman
Gillmor, and other members, on legislative refinements that would be consistent
with the President's principles and budget. EPA remains ready to work with all
members of the Energy and Commerce Committee as we work for enactment of
brownfields legislation this year.
Currently, EPA is
working in partnership with States and local communities to promote the cleanup
and development of brownfield properties. States are developing significant
expertise in the cleanup and development of brownfield properties, and together
with local communities, will continue to have the primary role.
Over the past few
years, as EPA developed and implemented its brownfields program, we have seen
that barriers may exist through uncertainty over Federal liability and the role
of EPA authority in cases where a State has taken action. When a State approves
a cleanup that is protective of human health and the environment, there should
be limited circumstances where EPA would need to take further action. There
should be a compelling reason for EPA to become involved in the cleanup. We do
not want to stifle State cleanup programs and fail in our goal of removing
barriers that prevent brownfields cleanup.
Brownfields cleanup
is an important urban redevelopment tool that provides an alternative to
development of greenfields. The Administration believes that brownfields
legislation is important enough to be considered independently from other
statutory reform efforts, such as Superfund. I know that some members of this
subcommittee are interested in reforming Superfund and EPA remains ready to work
with them, but I would continue to urge that Superfund issues not hold up
brownfields legislation.
President Bush is
committed to strengthen state and local brownfields programs based on the
following principles:
-
Brownfields
legislation should remove a significant hurdle to brownfields cleanup by
providing redevelopers with protection from federal Superfund liability;
-
Brownfields
legislation should ensure that states have the authority and resources to
run their own brownfields programs while ensuring those cleanups are
protective of human health and the environment;
-
Brownfields
legislation should direct EPA to work with the States to ensure that they
employ high, yet flexible cleanup standards, and allow EPA to step in to
enforce those standards only when necessary;
-
Brownfields
legislation should streamline and expedite the process by which grants are
given to states, and in turn to local communities, so that they have maximum
flexibility to use the funds according to their unique needs;
-
The
federal government should focus additional research and development efforts
on new cleanup technologies and techniques to clean up brownfields; and
-
While
not under the jurisdiction of this committee, the brownfields tax incentive
should be made permanent. The incentive expires at the end of 2003. The
Administration supports legislative efforts to make the tax incentive
permanent, which is reflected in the President's FY 2002 budget.
The States and the
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency have been at the forefront of encouraging
the cleanup and economic redevelopment of brownfields. EPA has awarded more than
399 assessment pilots of up to $200,000 each to states, Tribes, and local
governments to assist them with brownfields redevelopment. Grantees report that
EPA funding supported assessments at over 2000 properties and helped leverage
more than $3.1 billion in economic development and generated more than 12,000
jobs. EPA's job training pilots have trained more than 640 people and put more
than 480 to work. In addition, EPA has funded 127 revolving loan fund pilots,
provided over $90 million in funding for state programs, and worked with states
to perform Targeted Brownfields Assessments at more than 570 properties.
However, much
remains to be done to facilitate the rapid, high-quality assessment, cleanup and
sustainable economic development in communities across the nation. With your
help, this Administration is committed to providing the tools that communities
need to address the problems posed by brownfield properties, and it is committed
to encouraging redevelopment while fully protecting human health and the
environment.
Chairman Gillmor's
discussion draft, the Brownfields Revitalization and Environmental Restoration
Act of 2001, is developing as a major step forward in encouraging the cleanup
and development of contaminated brownfield properties. The draft authorizes
grants and loan programs to identify, assess and clean up brownfields
properties, and provides more flexibility to implement these programs.
The draft clarifies
Superfund liability for contiguous property owners, prospective purchasers, and
innocent landowners. While these provisions differ from similar provisions in
S.350 and some previous legislation, we are prepared to discuss them with you
and others as the committee continues development of a bill.
The real or
perceived threat of federal liability can be a barrier to brownfields
redevelopment. The draft places clear limits on federal enforcement authority
for sites cleaned up under a state response program. Furthermore, this
legislation also recognizes the necessity of striking an appropriate balance
between providing the finality needed to induce redevelopment and ensuring the
ongoing protection of public health and the environment. The draft does this by
maintaining a federal safety-net granting EPA authority to respond to real
threats to human health or the environment when a state is unwilling or unable
to do so.
The provisions that
provide for a federal safety-net are more limited than those found in S.350. EPA
is concerned that a brownfields bill not place too great a limit on EPA
authority and the federal safety net. We would like to work with the committee
on these provisions as the committee continues to develop a bill. Whatever
approach Congress chooses, we at EPA will only exercise Agency authority under
compelling circumstances - as demonstrated by the Agency's history of never
stepping in on its own at a brownfields site.
The Administration
supports brownfields legislation that encourages the identification, assessment,
cleanup, and redevelopment of a full range of contaminated brownfields
properties by specifically authorizing a federal program for grants and loans to
states, Tribes, and local governments. In addition, legislation should relieve
EPA's current brownfields program of unnecessary Superfund regulatory
procedures for the Brownfields Cleanup Revolving Loan Fund, and provide for
expedited grant funding of cleanup of contaminated properties.
Brownfields
legislation that is consistent with the President's principles should provide
flexible grant funding to the states, local communities, and Tribes to support
their brownfields programs in ways that will enhance the already impressive
achievements of the 47 state programs that address brownfields currently.
According to a study by the Northeast/Midwest Institute, more than 16,000
sites have enrolled in state voluntary cleanup programs. States with emerging
programs would benefit from resources and support that enable them to use
creative approaches in encouraging protective assessment, clean up and
redevelopment of property. States with established brownfields programs, such as
Ohio and New Jersey, would benefit from support that enhances successful
brownfields redevelopment work.
The Administration
also supports funding for technical assistance, training, and technology to
encourage the best methods and approaches to cleaning up brownfields. New tools
that improve the ability to conduct protective cleanups while reducing cost can
help promote the redevelopment of brownfields across the Nation. EPA would like
to work with the committee to address these issues as the committee continues
work on the draft.
Whether states and
localities receive Environmental Protection Agency grants for assessment and
cleanup, Housing and Urban Development grants for redevelopment, Economic
Development Administration grants - or whether redevelopment is encouraged by
the Federal Brownfields tax incentive - this Administration is committed to
providing the tools necessary to address the problem of contaminated brownfields
properties.
Thank you for the
opportunity to appear before you today to discuss brownfields legislation. I
look forward to working with you to achieve swift passage of a brownfields bill.
Mr. Chairman, I will be happy to
answer any questions you or the committee members may have.