Chairman Barton, Congressman
Boucher and members of the Subcommittee, thank you for inviting me to testify
before the Subcommittee on Energy and Air Quality.
My
name is Gary Swofford. I'm the
Vice President and Chief Operating Officer for the Delivery Business unit at
Puget Sound Energy. Puget Sound
Energy is a natural gas and electricity distribution company serving 1.4 million
customers in Western Washington. I
have been asked to speak to you today about our Personal Energy ManagementT
Program and the important role real-time electricity pricing can play in a
national energy policy.
For
the country to achieve the levels of efficiency that are possible in our use of
electricity, customers need to see the real price of electricity before they
make their purchase decisions. If
we are to see wholesale electricity prices rationalize, then the retail prices
that customers pay cannot remain fixed and unresponsive to the demand for more
supply. We need only look at the
chaos that has been associated with the price of electricity in California to
see the effects of wholesale markets that are deregulated and retail markets
that remain regulated. The remedy
sought by California is a return to regulation through the use of caps on the
price of wholesale electricity, when what they need is for customers to be able
to see and respond to the price of electricity while needed new supplies are
developed and brought on line.
The
imperative for real-time electricity pricing is considerable.
Failure to give customers proper price signals encourages 1) the wasteful
use of energy, 2) unnecessarily high costs and 3) bad habits.
On the other hand, giving customers the proper price signals results in
1) the efficient use of energy, 2) lower costs and 3) a sustainable energy use
ethic.
In
addition to driving up the costs, the wasteful use of energy has substantial
negative environmental impacts. We
use marginal resources that are both more expensive to operate and more
polluting, and we build more resources and electric system infrastructure than
would otherwise be needed. In a
recent analysis undertaken by the McKinsey Company, they found that the U.S.
could avoid spending $14.8 billion annually by implementing real-time
electricity pricing - with almost $8 billion of that avoided cost occurring in
the residential sector (see figure 1
below).
Figure 1.
A
significant portion of that avoided cost comes from the large impact on the
marginal price of wholesale electricity from a modest reduction in demand.
The Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) found that if California had
been able to reduce its demand on peak this past summer by just 2 ½ %, they
could have reduced what they paid by $700 million.
The Brattle Group in a report they did concluded that a 10% reduction in
peak demand resulted in a lowering of the peak wholesale price of 50%.
Real-time electricity pricing is made
possible by the integration of several key technologies that are all available
today (see figure 2).
Figure 2.
Customer
usage data is gathered by using newly developed metering technology that gathers
and stores this information in as small as 15-minute increments.
This information can then be gathered and sent daily or even hourly if so
desired. Newly developed customer
information systems (CIS) can take that usage information and match it with what
the market price is at the time of usage and can provide that information back
to customers making it possible for them to make informed purchase decisions.
At
Puget Sound Energy (PSE) we began providing usage information to 410,000 of our
residential, commercial and industrial customers last December.
In addition to monthly information in our billing statements, our
customers can also gain access to their usage data over the most recent 24-hour
period on our web site. They also
see the time blocks their usage occurred in (see figure 3).
If they don't have a computer, they can call our customer access center
and talk to a representative who will review the information with them.
The customer now has the usage information and the time blocks in which
their usage occurred and the price of electricity in each of those time periods.
They can now make decisions about how much energy they are using and when
they want to use it. The next day
they can look and see the impact of their choices (see figure 4).
.
Figure 3.
.
Figure 4.
Customer
acceptance and use of this information has been exceptional.
In a recently conducted survey of customers who have been receiving usage
information from the program we call Personal Energy Management (PEMT), we
were gratified to see that 91% of residential customers and 72% of business
customers were aware of our information program (see figure 5), and that the
most important things they learned were 1) the need to conserve energy, 2) how
they used energy by time-of-day, 3) the need to shift to off peak energy usage,
and 4) how to save and shift their energy usage (see figure 6).
The survey also showed that 79% of residential customers and 70% of
business customers had taken actions to alter their energy use (see figure 7),
and finally that as a result of the information they received about their usage
43% of residential customers shifted when they used electricity, and 41% reduced
their usage. For business customers
4% shifted their usage while 45% reduced what they used (see figure 8).
These are truly outstanding results for an information program.
Figure 5.
Figure 6.
Figure 7.
Figure 8.
On
April 25th of this year, the Washington Utilities and Transportation
Commission (WUTC) approved our filing to move from information only to pricing
electricity according to the time during which it is used, so called time-of-use
pricing. This is a pilot program
for 300,000 of our residential customers, and it is an important first step in
providing customers with the information they need to manage their energy use
and their electric bill. We are now
working on a filing we plan to make later this summer that will bring this
program to all classes of our customers and move us another step closer to
real-time electricity pricing.
As
you can see, we are very proud of our Personal Energy ManagementT program.
On June 5, 2001 PSE received the Edison Award from the Edison Electric
Institute (EEI). This award is presented annually by EEI to the utility that
demonstrates leadership and innovation in contributing to the advancement of the
electricity industry for the benefit of all. We earned this award in recognition of our Personal Energy
ManagementT program, a program that brings real-time electricity pricing
capabilities to our customers.
As
a matter of national energy policy, all customers need to have the ability to
receive real-time information about their usage and the price of electricity.
The emphasis to date has been on large commercial and industrial
customers, while the McKinsey analysis shows that over half of the annual
avoided costs are in the residential area.
The
integration and development of the systems needed to provide real-time
electricity pricing for PSE customers demonstrates that the technology is
available now. Our survey results
show its value to customers. We
have the means to achieve $15 billion in annual avoided cost savings and in so
doing, reduce the cost of electricity to customers, ensure that we are using the
resources we have as efficiently as possible, and only build the new resources
that are necessary.
What is preventing a national deployment of real-time pricing?
We
believe one of the issues for a utility is the up-front capital cost of
installing new metering technology. For this reason, we strongly support and urge this Congress
to pass a bill introduced by Congresswoman Jennifer Dunn - HR 1797, the
"Energy Efficiency and Conservation Incentives Act of 2001." If passed, this bill would provide utilities with a tax
deduction for either retrofitting or installing new real-time metering systems
for their customers. We believe
this bill will provide utilities with the financial incentive they need to
deploy a real-time pricing on a much greater scale.
In
conclusion, I have submitted written copies with my testimony as well as a copy
of the McKinsey white paper I referenced in my remarks.
Again, I appreciate the opportunity to address the subcommittee, and I
would be happy to answer any questions you may have.
Attachment
(White paper - McKinsey & Co.)
06/21/01