|
Subcommittee on Health
June 13, 2001
10:00 AM
2322 Rayburn House Office
Summary of
Essential Points in Testimony
-
HealthValue
is a national coalition representing often competing stakeholders in the
healthcare economy who are in consensus about how to improve
direct-to-consumer advertising of prescription drugs.
-
Direct-to-consumer
advertising of prescription drugs is believed by all stakeholders in the
healthcare economy to have a significant impact on patients' and physicians'
prescribing decisions.
-
The information
about potential risks associated with prescription drugs which are advertised
directly to consumers is inadequate.
-
Congress should
instruct FDA to convene a task force comprised of manufacturers, providers,
consumer representatives and experts regarding effective means of conveying
health care information to make recommendations for improving the disclosure
of risk information in direct-to-consumer advertising of prescription drugs.
Mr. Chairman,
Members of the Committee, I am John D. Golenski, Executive Director of
RxHealthValue, a national coalition of consumer groups, labor unions, provider
groups, business groups and employers, insurers and health plans, pharmacy
benefits management organizations, and academic researchers committed to
improving Americans' access to health-improving prescription drugs. (Our
membership list is appended below.) As you can understand, a deliberative body
comprised of nearly 30 organizations will rarely arrive at full consensus
regarding any issue. Remarkably, our membership has achieved consensus regarding
the recommendations I am offering regarding Direct-to-Consumer (DTC) advertising
of prescription drugs to consumers and patients. I believe the fact of these
consensus recommendations indicates the fundamental importance of this issue for
the members of RxHealthValue. It is our belief that this form of advertising
affects the health and safety of American patients and consumers.
The tremendous
increase in the extent of DTC advertising of prescription drugs since the FDA
removed the requirement for the "brief summary" of risk information in
19971 is well documented2. It is almost impossible to open a general news
magazine, view a prime time television program or listen to the radio and not
see or hear advertising for prescription drugs. Given that the prescribing
physician is the decision-maker regarding the use of these medications, it is
all the more startling that so many resources are expended by drug manufacturers
to affect the attitudes of consumers and patients. Although there is little
evidence3 currently available regarding whether consumer and patient attitudes
affect physician choice in prescribing, no stakeholders in the health system and
health economy have suggested that the impact of such advertising is
insubstantial. Given the FDA's expressed interest in assessing the effects of
DTC advertising, we expect more direct evidence of impact will be available in
the near term future.
While we await the
results of planned and pending studies on the effects of DTC advertising on the
attitudes, behaviors and medical outcomes of consumers and patients,
RxHealthValue members are concerned that risk information in particular is not
adequately or effectively conveyed in DTC advertising. One of our member
organizations, AARP, recently conducted a survey of members to assess the impact
of DTC advertising4 finding that nearly a third of those surveyed could not
recall ever seeing risk information in the ads. Two thirds of the survey
population felt the information presented in such advertising was not
particularly helpful in assessing recommendations about whether to take
prescription medications. This poses a serious safety risk to consumers and
patients. In our first recommendations to the FDA, presented publically one year
ago at the National Press Club, RxHealthValue emphasized the fundamental
importance of protecting the safety of patients and consumers who are confronted
by DTC advertising5
Thus, RxHealthValue
recommends that the Congress direct the FDA:
. To convene a
task force of key stakeholders, including the pharmaceutical manufacturers who
advertise prescription drugs, as well as consumer groups, patient
organizations, provider groups, payers and relevant experts, to develop and
test standards for information disclosure in DTC advertising.
. To more
carefully define the concrete meaning of "fair balance" in
disclosing benefits and risks of advertised medications to include disclosure
of other appropriate therapies in addition to alternative medications.
. To further
define "fair balance" to mean that full disclosure of risks and side
effects be given equal print and air time as the description of benefits in
the same communication.
RxHealthValue
recommends that the Congress direct that the appropriate agencies of the Federal
Government conduct on-going research to evaluate the effects of DTC advertising
on the health of American consumers and patients. It is a given that many
Americans appreciate the increased awareness of diseases and conditions and
potential therapies which DTC advertising makes possible. It is also true that
such advertising can obscure potential hazards of the pharmaceutical advertised
and neglect the relative value of other forms of therapy. Only thorough,
independent research can demonstrate the differential impact of such advertising
upon the health choices of American patients and physicians.
In conclusion, the members of
RxHealthValue applaud the Committee for engaging this dialogue about the effects
of this increasingly pervasive influence on the therapeutic choices of American
consumers and patients. We pledge our assistance in implementing any of the
recommendations we have offered and thank the Committee for this opportunity to
comment.
Printer
Friendly
Comment
On This Page
Related
Documents
|